Monday, January 16, 2012
Friday, January 13, 2012
Murdoch Support's Scottish National Party Leader Alex Salmond
Rupert Murdoch seems to have something of a love/hate affair with the UK.
On one hand, its the place where he made his legend, and his love for his British newspapers seems to go far beyond all economic sense.
On the other hand, it may well be the place that ruins his empire thanks to that whole "phone-hacking" business.
Lately, Murdoch seems to be leaning towards the latter. One of his first actions on Twitter was to rip the country's finances.
However, another early tweet from Murdoch also caught many people's attention — a note giving his support for the leader of the Scottish Nationalist Party, Alex Salmond.
Now, with an independent Scotland possibly on the cards, we wonder what role exactly Murdoch and News Corp have played in that situation.
Way back in July, LeftFoodForward posted 25 questions for Salmond online. The questions are clearly directed at the SNP's relationship with News Corp — with details of meetings with James Murdoch demanded, amongst other details about advertising and funding requested. Salmond initially balked at responding.
Eventually, under pressure from multiple sources, Salmond released some of his correspondence with Murdoch. It turned out to be especially fawning: "I hope that News International goes from strength to strength," he said in one correspondence. Critics described it as a "four year campaign" to "seduce Rupert Murdoch"....read more
Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/rupert-murdoch-alex-salmond-snp-2012-1?utm_source=twbutton&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=europe#ixzz1jPvlfybX
On one hand, its the place where he made his legend, and his love for his British newspapers seems to go far beyond all economic sense.
On the other hand, it may well be the place that ruins his empire thanks to that whole "phone-hacking" business.
Lately, Murdoch seems to be leaning towards the latter. One of his first actions on Twitter was to rip the country's finances.
However, another early tweet from Murdoch also caught many people's attention — a note giving his support for the leader of the Scottish Nationalist Party, Alex Salmond.
Now, with an independent Scotland possibly on the cards, we wonder what role exactly Murdoch and News Corp have played in that situation.
Way back in July, LeftFoodForward posted 25 questions for Salmond online. The questions are clearly directed at the SNP's relationship with News Corp — with details of meetings with James Murdoch demanded, amongst other details about advertising and funding requested. Salmond initially balked at responding.
Eventually, under pressure from multiple sources, Salmond released some of his correspondence with Murdoch. It turned out to be especially fawning: "I hope that News International goes from strength to strength," he said in one correspondence. Critics described it as a "four year campaign" to "seduce Rupert Murdoch"....read more
Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/rupert-murdoch-alex-salmond-snp-2012-1?utm_source=twbutton&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=europe#ixzz1jPvlfybX
#Leveson : The #Guardian -Smug - Arrogant And Subject To Special Treatment
Quote
It must be so delightful being a Guardian journalist. Always being right. Always being morally superior.
They have undoubtedly broken some fantastic, important stories, such as Trafigura, the Wiki-leaks cable dump, and phone hacking, but this in turn has had the effect of lacing their material with a dose of arrogance; an air of the untouchable. Too often, the Guardian themselves try to be the story - look at the books from Guardian hacks about Wiki-leaks, for example.
This is a dangerous mind-set to have for any organisation whose role is meant to be questioning those in power.
All newspapers try to write eye catching, agenda setting stories; that is how they sell papers and survive. However, there is a smugness about Guardian journalists; an unchallengeable assertion that their angle is the right, and only acceptable one that leaves a slightly more bitter taste in the mouth than others. Just follow a few of them on Twitter if you don’t believe me. You’ll soon see what I mean.
The truth is that the Guardian is hardly perfect. Having instigated the closure of the News of the World, and the resulting loss of 300 jobs, it has transpired that people working for the NOTW did not cause the deletion that gave the Dowler parents false hope.
Was there an ounce of humility from the Editor-In-Chief Alan Rusbridger, or Nick Davies, whose by-line adorns the story? Not a bit of it. There was excuse after excuse, a defensive piece by Davies, and a note in the corrections and clarifications column. Given that this was a game changing, front page story, this hardly constitutes the like-for-like apology so often demanded by Guardianistas....read more
http://www.thecommentator.com/article/789/the_guardian_smug_arrogant_and_subject_to_special_treatment
It must be so delightful being a Guardian journalist. Always being right. Always being morally superior.
They have undoubtedly broken some fantastic, important stories, such as Trafigura, the Wiki-leaks cable dump, and phone hacking, but this in turn has had the effect of lacing their material with a dose of arrogance; an air of the untouchable. Too often, the Guardian themselves try to be the story - look at the books from Guardian hacks about Wiki-leaks, for example.
This is a dangerous mind-set to have for any organisation whose role is meant to be questioning those in power.
All newspapers try to write eye catching, agenda setting stories; that is how they sell papers and survive. However, there is a smugness about Guardian journalists; an unchallengeable assertion that their angle is the right, and only acceptable one that leaves a slightly more bitter taste in the mouth than others. Just follow a few of them on Twitter if you don’t believe me. You’ll soon see what I mean.
The truth is that the Guardian is hardly perfect. Having instigated the closure of the News of the World, and the resulting loss of 300 jobs, it has transpired that people working for the NOTW did not cause the deletion that gave the Dowler parents false hope.
Was there an ounce of humility from the Editor-In-Chief Alan Rusbridger, or Nick Davies, whose by-line adorns the story? Not a bit of it. There was excuse after excuse, a defensive piece by Davies, and a note in the corrections and clarifications column. Given that this was a game changing, front page story, this hardly constitutes the like-for-like apology so often demanded by Guardianistas....read more
http://www.thecommentator.com/article/789/the_guardian_smug_arrogant_and_subject_to_special_treatment
Thursday, January 12, 2012
#Leveson : #Desmond Reported The FACTS - McCanns Turned The Investigation On Them Into' Libel' With Clever Moves By Carter Ruck
Paedophile Allegations That Would Have Given Pause For Thought To A Fund Built With Absolutely No Evidence . The McCanns Through Their Witness Statements Are Both 100% Proven Liars
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/KATERINA-PAYNE-INCIDENT.htm
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/TAVARES_ALMEIDA.htm
http://news.sky.com/home/uk-news/article/16147663
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/KATERINA-PAYNE-INCIDENT.htm
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/TAVARES_ALMEIDA.htm
http://news.sky.com/home/uk-news/article/16147663
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)